Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Essays

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Essays Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Essay Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Essay The purpose of this particular article was to develop insight regarding the general public’s thoughts about witnessed CPR. Being the purpose of this article, it looked into the reactions of four hundred and eight respondents who are 18 years old and above, residing in Conernaugh Health System’s Memorial Medical Center’s Service Area, through a telephone survey on whether or not they are in favor of the presence of their family members in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation or what is commonly known as CPR. The central question that this article aimed to answer was â€Å"Are the people in favor to have their family and friends physically present during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation? † Between the 29th of April and the 14th of May 2003, four hundred eight telephone interviews have been made by a consulting firm from Holleran, Mountville, PA. The said interview is made in compliance with the survey research quality guidelines that the American Survey Research Organization came up with. The respondents of the survey who were made to answer the central question of this article were aged 18 and above and were chosen at random from the list of residents living in the vicinity of the Memorial Medical Center’s Service Area in southwest Pennsylvania. This particular consulting firm who is in charge of this particular study hired a professional, hired interviewer to contact the respondents through telephone. Upon reaching their perspective respondents, and upon having them on the other line, the subject of the survey and of the study was presented. They were given the chance to decline or accept the invitation to participate in the study which went on for 8-10 minutes. The first part of this particular article clearly states the purpose of this piece of work, and that is to obtain the opinions of people. However, the theories and concepts used to study the reaction of the people with regard to the Public’s Attitude and Perception Concerning Witnessed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation has not been efficiently discussed. It should have presented the major reasons why they think that physical presence is important not just to the patient but to the family and friends as well. At the same time, it was not able to show what the disadvantages of having the friends and family during CPR. All it ever said was that it remains to be a controversial issue. It should have presented why it is so. First, the presence of family members could affect the performance of the staff dealing with the resuscitation itself. At the same time, it may raise the levels of anxiety and at the same time, a depressed relative might disrupt the process. At the same time, the family may experience negative emotional and psychological consequences when they witness activities that are traumatic such as this. These considerations should be included in the article, and be used to look into the disadvantages and advantages of having family members during CPR (European Society of Cardiology, 2007). The study seems to have focused a lot on the results the study which is apparently very good as it clearly supports the purpose of the article. According to the results, 49. 3% of the respondents would like to be present while CPR is being performed on his or her loved one. The respondents who chose this believe that their presence could benefit the patient undergoing the said medical process. On the other hand, 43% believe that even if their presence is acknowledged, the physician should remain as the primary decision maker in the situation concerning CPR. Generally, the article was able to show how important witnessing the CPR of a loved one is to a person. This could be of help to the nurses and other health professionals be more sensitive to the needs of their patients and their loved ones in times when they need each other the most. Hence, this study was able to provide insights on the attitudes regarding witnessed resuscitation. Many of them would prefer to be at their loved ones’ side during CPR. Because of this, the development of most CPR programs should be reinvestigated and redesigned to accommodate the wishes of the patients and their loved ones. Basically, the weakness of this article lies in the absence of the explanation of the concepts and theories included in this study while its strength lies upon how it was able to meet its objectives and goals through the in depth presentation of the results obtained through the phone interviews. Somehow, it was able to capture the sentiments of the people with concerning CPR, whether or not they want to experience it being done on a loved one or someone close to them. References European Society of Cardiology. 2007. The presence of family members during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The World of Critical Care Nursing. Volume 5. Number 4. Retrieved November 8, 2007 from www. connectpublishing. com/Connects/conf/5. 4_1. pdf Mazer, M. A. , Cox, L. A. , Capon, J. A. 2006. The public’s attitude and perception concerning witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 2006. Vol. 34, No. 12. pp. 2925- 2928.